SGLT2 Inhibitors and Bone Health: What You Need to Know About Fracture Risk

SGLT2 Inhibitors and Bone Health: What You Need to Know About Fracture Risk
  • 19 Nov 2025
  • 11 Comments

SGLT2 Inhibitor Fracture Risk Assessment Tool

This tool helps you understand your personalized fracture risk when taking SGLT2 inhibitors. Based on data from major clinical trials, it provides evidence-based guidance for you and your doctor.

Your Health Information

When you’re managing type 2 diabetes, choosing the right medication isn’t just about lowering blood sugar. It’s about protecting your whole body - heart, kidneys, and yes, even your bones. SGLT2 inhibitors like canagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dapagliflozin have become popular because they do more than just control glucose. They cut heart failure hospitalizations, slow kidney decline, and help with weight loss. But around 2015, something unexpected popped up: a possible link to broken bones. Not for all of them. Not for everyone. But enough to make doctors pause and rethink who should take what.

Why Did Canagliflozin Raise Red Flags?

The first big warning came from the CANVAS trial in 2017. Researchers found that people taking canagliflozin (Invokana) at the 300 mg dose had about 26% more fractures than those on placebo. Most of these weren’t from car crashes or sports injuries - they happened after simple falls, like slipping off a curb or tripping over a rug. The fractures were mostly in the hip, wrist, and upper arm. That’s the kind of damage you see in older adults with thinning bones.

What made it worse was how fast it happened. Some fractures showed up within 12 weeks of starting the drug. That’s not enough time for bone density to drop naturally. Something else had to be going on. Follow-up studies showed canagliflozin caused small but measurable bone mineral density (BMD) loss - about 1% at the hip and spine over two years. That might sound small, but for someone already at risk, it’s enough to tip the scales.

Why does this happen? It’s not one thing. It’s a mix. Canagliflozin makes you pee out more sugar, but it also pulls out phosphate. That tricks your body into thinking it’s low on phosphate, so your parathyroid gland kicks in and starts breaking down bone to release minerals. At the same time, some women on canagliflozin saw their estrogen levels drop - and estrogen is a key protector of bone. Then there’s the drop in body weight. Losing 2-4 kg sounds good, but it can mean less mechanical stress on bones, which weakens them over time. And let’s not forget: SGLT2 inhibitors can cause dizziness or low blood pressure when standing up. That increases fall risk. So you’ve got weaker bones, and a higher chance of falling.

Not All SGLT2 Inhibitors Are the Same

This is where things get clearer - and more important. The problem isn’t the whole class. It’s mostly canagliflozin, especially at the higher 300 mg dose. Empagliflozin (Jardiance) and dapagliflozin (Farxiga) have shown no increased fracture risk in large trials like EMPA-REG OUTCOME and DECLARE-TIMI 58. A 2023 meta-analysis of nearly 21,000 patients found no overall link between SGLT2 inhibitors and fractures - but when they pulled out canagliflozin, the risk disappeared.

The FDA updated its label for canagliflozin in 2016 to include a formal warning about fractures. It didn’t do the same for empagliflozin or dapagliflozin. That’s not an accident. It’s based on real data. European regulators took a broader approach and put class-wide warnings on all SGLT2 inhibitors. But in the U.S., the guidance is more precise: the risk is tied to one drug, not the whole group.

Real-world prescribing patterns reflect this. Between 2017 and 2022, canagliflozin prescriptions in the U.S. dropped by 22%. Meanwhile, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin prescriptions rose by over 40%. Why? Doctors started avoiding canagliflozin in patients with osteoporosis, a history of falls, or low bone density. They kept prescribing the others.

Canagliflozin as a villain fights two heroic SGLT2 drugs in a medical courtroom scene.

Who Should Be Cautious?

If you’re over 65, have had a previous fracture, or have osteoporosis (T-score of -2.5 or lower), canagliflozin is generally not recommended. The American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria even lists it as a “potentially inappropriate medication” for older adults with bone issues. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists says you should check bone density before starting canagliflozin in these patients - and if it’s too low, pick something else.

But here’s the catch: diabetes itself harms bone health. High blood sugar over time reduces bone quality, increases inflammation, and raises fracture risk. So if you’re avoiding canagliflozin because of bone concerns, you’re not eliminating risk - you’re just switching to another drug that might not help your heart or kidneys as much.

For most people without prior fractures or low bone density, the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors still outweigh the risks. Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are safe choices even for older adults. In fact, one 2023 study in JAMA Network Open found that SGLT2 inhibitors had lower fracture rates than GLP-1 agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors in high-risk groups.

A man slips on a rug while his weight and bones vanish, with cartoonish bone and hormone monsters.

What Should You Do?

Don’t stop your medication without talking to your doctor. But do ask these questions:

  • Which SGLT2 inhibitor am I on?
  • Have I had any fractures before?
  • Do I have osteoporosis or low bone density?
  • Have I had falls or dizziness since starting this drug?

If you’re on canagliflozin and have any of those risk factors, ask about switching to empagliflozin or dapagliflozin. If you’re on one of the safer ones and doing well, there’s no need to change.

For everyone, regardless of drug choice, take steps to protect your bones:

  • Get a DXA scan if you’re over 65 or have risk factors
  • Make sure you’re getting enough calcium (1,000-1,200 mg/day) and vitamin D (800-1,000 IU/day)
  • Do weight-bearing exercises like walking or resistance training
  • Remove tripping hazards at home - loose rugs, cluttered floors, poor lighting
  • Review other medications that cause dizziness, like diuretics or sleep aids

The Big Picture: Benefits Still Outweigh Risks

It’s easy to get scared by headlines that say “diabetes drug causes fractures.” But the truth is more nuanced. For most people, SGLT2 inhibitors are safe and life-saving. The fracture risk is real - but it’s not class-wide. It’s mostly tied to one drug at one dose in one group of people.

The American Diabetes Association now says SGLT2 inhibitors as a class don’t increase fracture risk - with a clear footnote: canagliflozin is the exception. Their Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) only adds 0.5 points to your score if you’re on canagliflozin. No point for the others.

Doctors are getting better at sorting this out. A 2022 survey showed that 82% of endocrinologists avoid canagliflozin in patients with osteoporosis, but only 34% hesitate with dapagliflozin. That’s progress. The data has caught up with clinical experience.

If you’re on an SGLT2 inhibitor and worried, talk to your doctor. Don’t assume all of them are the same. Don’t assume the risk is unavoidable. And don’t stop taking a drug that’s helping your heart and kidneys - unless you have a better, safer alternative.

Diabetes isn’t just about sugar. It’s about your whole body. And protecting your bones is part of that.

Posted By: Elliot Farnsworth

Comments

Simran Mishra

Simran Mishra

November 20, 2025 AT 08:32 AM

It’s funny how we treat drugs like they’re all the same when they’re not-canagliflozin isn’t the villain, it’s just the one that got caught in the crosshairs of bad luck and biology. I’ve seen patients on it for years with no issues, but then again, I’ve also seen the hip fractures come in like clockwork after 14 weeks. It’s not the drug, it’s the person. And we’re still too lazy to screen properly.

Tiffany Fox

Tiffany Fox

November 21, 2025 AT 15:21 PM

My grandma’s on dapagliflozin and hasn’t fallen once since she started doing morning walks. No fractures, no drama. Just better sugar control and less swelling in her legs. If your doctor didn’t explain the difference between these drugs, ask again.

Sarah Khan

Sarah Khan

November 22, 2025 AT 19:19 PM

Diabetes doesn’t just attack your pancreas-it erodes your skeleton slowly, silently, like rust under paint. The real tragedy isn’t that one SGLT2 inhibitor might nudge fracture risk up a bit-it’s that we’ve spent decades ignoring how metabolic disease fractures bone from within. Canagliflozin didn’t cause the problem. It just made it visible. The system didn’t care until the numbers screamed. We’re still treating glucose like the enemy, not the symptom.

Keith Avery

Keith Avery

November 23, 2025 AT 07:58 AM

Of course the FDA didn’t warn on all of them. That’s because the trials were designed to fail canagliflozin. Look at the dose-300mg is almost a loading dose. Nobody in Europe takes that. And yet, the meta-analysis says nothing? That’s not science. That’s regulatory theater. Empagliflozin? Probably just got lucky with the patient pool.

Bob Stewart

Bob Stewart

November 23, 2025 AT 17:04 PM

Fracture risk with canagliflozin is real but dose-dependent and confined to specific populations. Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin demonstrate no significant increase in fracture incidence in phase 3 trials or real-world cohorts. Bone mineral density loss is modest and reversible upon discontinuation. Screening for osteoporosis and fall risk remains standard of care. No class-wide warning is warranted. The data supports targeted caution not blanket avoidance.

Courtney Mintenko

Courtney Mintenko

November 23, 2025 AT 21:28 PM

They’re all poison. You think you’re saving your heart but you’re just trading one slow death for another. Bone breaks, then kidney failure, then your legs give out, then you’re in a wheelchair wondering why they didn’t just let you die with your sugar high. They don’t care. They just want the prescription numbers to go up.

Kevin Mustelier

Kevin Mustelier

November 25, 2025 AT 06:11 AM

So basically, if you’re old and clumsy and on canagliflozin, you might break a hip. Cool. So don’t take it. But if you’re young, fit, and want to lose weight and protect your kidneys? Empagliflozin’s your buddy. Why are we still acting like this is a crisis? It’s not. It’s medicine. You don’t stop driving because someone got hit by a car. You just don’t drive drunk.

😅

Rohini Paul

Rohini Paul

November 26, 2025 AT 05:53 AM

I’m from India and we don’t have DXA machines everywhere, but we do have elders tripping over cow dung and uneven floors. If you’re giving anyone a drug that makes them dizzy and loses bone density, you better be sure they have a safe home. No drug is safe if the environment is a death trap. Maybe we need to fix the floor before we fix the prescription.

Holly Lowe

Holly Lowe

November 28, 2025 AT 00:22 AM

Imagine your bones are a house. Sugar’s the termites. SGLT2 inhibitors are the termite spray. Canagliflozin? It’s the spray that also cracks the foundation a little. Empagliflozin? It kills the bugs without touching the wood. You don’t trash the whole spray-you just pick the one that doesn’t wreck your home. And then you install handrails anyway. Because life’s not about perfect drugs. It’s about smart living.

Natalie Sofer

Natalie Sofer

November 29, 2025 AT 07:47 AM

my dr switched me from cana to farxiga last year and i havent fallen once. also my knees feel better? weird but true. just ask questions. dont panic. and maybe clean up your living room. loose rugs are the real enemy.

Kelly Library Nook

Kelly Library Nook

December 1, 2025 AT 03:01 AM

The entire narrative is dangerously oversimplified. You claim canagliflozin is the outlier. But the CANVAS trial was underpowered for fracture endpoints. The difference was borderline significant. Meanwhile, the EMPA-REG trial excluded patients with prior fractures. The DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial had minimal elderly representation. This isn’t science. It’s confirmation bias dressed as clinical guidance. The real risk is in the data we refuse to see-not the drug we conveniently scapegoat.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published